Scientific Education

Paper review system

All submitted papers have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymized refereeing by at least two anonymous referees. Papers will be evaluated for originality, significance, clarity, and contribution. All review comments and suggestions should be addressed in the final submission.
Submitted Papers must not have been previously published or currently submitted for publication elsewhere.

Scientific Education makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in its publications. However, Scientific Education make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness or suitability for any purpose of the Content and disclaim all such representations and warranties whether express or implied to the maximum extent permitted by law. Any views expressed in this publication are the views of the authors and are not the views of Scientific Education.

Apply to become a reviewer

We are always on the look-out for people to join our team of reviewers. If you feel you can make a regular, or even occasional, quality contribution of reviews to Scientific Education, please drop us an e-mail with subject ‘Reviewers’ at

We would like to know:
  • A bit about you (Brief curriculum vitae)
  • Areas of expertise
  • Number of papers to review per year
  • Comments/suggestions
Reviewers are expected to write reviews in a timely, collegial, and constructive manner. Maintaining Scientific Education as a scientific publisher of the highest quality depends on reviewers with a high level of expertise and an ability to be objective, fair, and insightful in their evaluation of manuscripts.

Your name and affiliation will appear on the Editorial Board Page, section Program committee members of the Conference.